Microsoft — Wisconsin (Mount Pleasant/Kenosha axis) — Phase 1 — Snapshot

Verdict

This site scores above the peer cohort top quartile on the composite, but schedule risk remains the dominant concern. The final score is a weighted blend of schedule, deliverability, cost, carbon, and reliability views.

Site Readiness Index

57%

index

ProxyConfidence 68%Better than median

Benchmark

Median: 45% · Top quartile: 54%

1
Schedule risk (slippage)
Expected schedule slippage is far above the pinned peer cohort; schedule-chain inputs are currently marked stale and need validation.
2
Power deliverability strength
Deliverable capacity by target is above the peer cohort top quartile, supporting strong capacity positioning.
3
Favorable reliability + emissions posture
Reliability risk is better than the peer cohort median and emissions intensity is also below median, partially offsetting schedule risk.

KPI	Current	Benchmark (Median / Top quartile)	Confidence
Site Readiness Index Stale	57%index ProxyBetter than median	45% / 54% median / top quartile	68% proxy-heavy
Probability of Hitting In‑Service Date Stale	4% EstimatedWorse than median	30% / 46% median / top quartile	70%
Schedule Slippage (Days) Stale	758days EstimatedWorse than median	341 / 456 median / top quartile	70%
Deliverable Capacity by Target (MW) Current	450MW ProxyBetter than median	44.73 / 68.89 median / top quartile	65% proxy-heavy
Blended Effective Power Rate ($/MWh) Current	$139USD/MWh Computed	— / — median / top quartile	81%
Expected Emissions Intensity (kgCO₂e/MWh) Current	342.462kgCO2e/MWh ComputedBetter than median	348.95 / 458.42 median / top quartile	70%
Reliability Risk Index Current	15%index ComputedBetter than median	44% / 64% median / top quartile	63%
Total Delay Cost Exposure ($) Stale	$1.7B Proxy	— / — median / top quartile	75% proxy-heavy
Renewable Content (%) Current	12% ComputedBetter than median	11% / 23% median / top quartile	70%

Validate the schedule-chain inputs that drive expected slippage for Phase 1, then refresh this snapshot.