Power and Timing Scorecard

Data Center Power Availability and Timing

Test whether a data center project can get power by the target in-service date before you commit schedule, capital, or customer capacity. Review interconnection timing, upgrade exposure, long-lead equipment, tariff pressure, and resilience constraints in one scorecard.

For data center developers, infrastructure teams, and investors evaluating a specific project.

Can this data center project get power by the target in-service date?

Example scorecard evidence

Review public project examples, the score dimensions behind the scorecard, and adjacent briefs that show how the work is framed.

What the scorecard checks

Utility power timing

When utility and interconnection milestones are likely to land relative to the target in-service date.

Upgrade and deliverability risk

Whether network upgrades, congestion, or deliverability constraints are likely to block the requested capacity.

Long-lead equipment exposure

How transformer and switchgear lead times affect the critical path and what procurement actions materially change it.

Tariff and resilience pressure

How tariff structure, demand charges, and grid reliability signals change cost and operating confidence.

What we test

  • utility power timing
  • interconnection and upgrade risk
  • long-lead electrical equipment exposure
  • tariff and resilience constraints

What the scorecard includes

  • a scored view of whether a project can hit the target in-service date
  • the main power and schedule risks behind that conclusion
  • the gating issues most likely to delay energization

Power and Timing Scorecard

Can this data center project get power by the target in-service date?

Preview the variables behind the scorecard

These cards show the outcome measures, conditions, and levers tracked in the power and timing scorecard.

Key outcome measures

Site Readiness Index
Composite 0-1 score combining schedule, capacity, cost, carbon, and reliability to rank candidate sites.
Insufficient sampleProxyConfidence 80%Higher is better
Probability of Hitting In‑Service Date
Probability (0–1) that the site reaches Commercial Operation Date (COD) by the target date given interconnection, equipment, and permitting risks.
StaleComputedConfidence 80%Higher is better
Schedule Slippage (Days)
Expected days late relative to the target in‑service date (v0: clamped to ≥ 0; early/on‑time yields 0).
Insufficient sampleUnknownConfidence 67%Higher is worse
Deliverable Capacity by Target (MW)
MW expected to be physically deliverable by the target date for continuous operations (v0: grid-deliverable proxy; excludes backup gen/BESS unless explicitly modeled).
Blended Effective Power Rate ($/MWh)
All‑in effective energy cost including volumetric energy, demand charge conversion, Demand Response (DR) credits, and on‑site Distributed Energy Resources (DER) savings.
Insufficient sampleInferredConfidence 50%Higher is worse
Expected Emissions Intensity (kgCO₂e/MWh)
Blended operational carbon intensity after Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)/Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and on‑site Distributed Energy Resources (DER) effects.
Insufficient sampleProxyConfidence 83%Higher is worse
Reliability Risk Index
0–1 proxy index of outage/curtailment risk from grid reliability signals (v0: grid-only; on-site resilience not yet incorporated).
StaleProxyConfidence 86%Higher is worse
Total Delay Cost Exposure ($)
Expected financial impact of schedule slippage (lost revenue, liquidated damages, carrying costs).
CurrentComputedConfidence 57%Higher is worse
Renewable Content (%)
Proxy renewable share for the relevant grid/portfolio (v0: often grid-mix or corporate posture proxy; not necessarily site-contracted coverage).
Not availableInferredConfidence 70%Higher is better

Key conditions behind the scorecard

Interconnection Queue Wait (Months)
Estimated remaining time in the interconnection queue for the selected path.
Insufficient sampleDirectConfidence 52%Higher is worse
Interconnection Complexity Index
0-1 index capturing voltage class, network topology, upgrade scope, and deliverability hurdles.
Insufficient sampleInferredConfidence 65%Higher is worse
Network Upgrade Cost ($)
Utility/ISO‑estimated share of network upgrade CAPEX attributable to the interconnection.
CurrentQualitativeConfidence 65%Higher is worse
Deliverability Risk Index
0-1 risk that requested capacity cannot be delivered at peak due to constraints.
Insufficient sampleComputedConfidence 69%Higher is worse
Available Grid Capacity (MW)
Estimated MW of firm capacity available at the point of interconnection by target date.
Not availableDirectConfidence 54%Higher is better
Transformer Lead Time (Months)
Quoted lead time for required high‑voltage/medium‑voltage transformers.
CurrentComputedConfidence 82%Higher is worse
Switchgear Lead Time (Months)
Quoted lead time for medium‑voltage switchgear and main protective devices.
CurrentDirectConfidence 79%Higher is worse
Permitting Risk Index
0–1 risk score reflecting zoning fit, environmental review, and Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) workload.
Insufficient sampleComputedConfidence 68%Higher is worse
Tariff Energy Charge ($/MWh)
Blended volumetric energy rate for the applicable tariff/Time‑of‑Use (TOU) class.
Insufficient sampleComputedConfidence 90%Higher is worse
Tariff Demand Charge ($/kW·mo)
Monthly demand charge for the applicable tariff/voltage class (excl. ratchets/standby unless modeled in overlays).
CurrentComputedConfidence 66%Higher is worse
Marginal Emissions Rate (kgCO₂e/MWh)
Grid marginal emissions intensity for the site’s balancing area (period‑appropriate blend).
CurrentProxyConfidence 77%Higher is worse
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) Availability (MW)
Indicative MW of bankable renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) available in the target geography/term window.
Not availableEstimatedConfidence 50%Higher is better
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) Price ($/MWh)
Indicative PPA price proxy; v0 may be imputed from the blended effective power rate when offer data isn't available.
Not availableUnknownConfidence 81%Higher is worse
Grid Curtailment Risk Index
0-1 risk that delivered/contracted energy is curtailed due to system constraints.
StaleInferredConfidence 80%Higher is worse
Grid Reliability (SAIDI, min/yr)
System Average Interruption Duration Index for the serving utility territory.
StaleProxyConfidence 78%Higher is worse
Site Control Secured
Whether site control (Letter of Intent (LOI)/option/lease/purchase) is secured, enabling permit submissions.
CurrentComputedConfidence 83%Higher is better

Levers that can change the scorecard

Expedite Procurement Budget ($)
Budget set aside to accelerate long‑lead equipment procurement.
Transformer Expedite Option Selected
Whether an expedited transformer procurement option is chosen.
Temporary Generation Committed (MW)
Rental or temporary generation capacity committed to bridge early operations.
Battery Storage Committed (MWh)
Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) energy capacity contracted for the site.
On‑Site Solar Capacity Committed (MW)
Nameplate MW of on‑site Photovoltaic (PV) committed (if feasible given land/roof).
Renewable Content Target (%)
Target share of load to be covered by renewables over the commitment period.
Demand Response (DR) Enrollment Commitment (kW)
Proxy: territory-level demand response (DR) enrolled curtailable load (kW); not a subject-level commitment unless disclosed.
Talk to a domain expertSee data sources and refresh rules

Related solutions